CaiIyn Dove
Perkone
Caldari State
10
   |
Posted - 2012.12.26 21:55:00 -
[1] - Quote
I just see a lot of sabre pilots ranges.
I can still recall that how I was disappointed as a noob pilot, when entered three 2/10s and saw only broken structures or empty cans.
Good job CCP, more chances to newbies, let the 2/10 camping sabres/dramiels get to low sec
To liars who talking about PVP: there are lots of FW sites there and they are much better place for 1v1 or small gang pvps than low-sec 2/10s, enjoy it or try to make up another reason to pull the high-sec veteran farms back. |
CaiIyn Dove
Perkone
Caldari State
24
|
Posted - 2012.12.31 23:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
Angelus Ryan wrote:
I think this is the part that you got wrong: It matters absolutely not what they were designed to be. The only thing that matters is how they are used in practice. ........................
Angelus Ryan wrote:
What did you expect, that a plex with a first gate spawn time of 1.5 hours would be readily available all the time?
..................
Otherwise: "No Gist For You".
Low level static complexes were designed to be the easy entrance for new players to play the exploration part of the game. When it is being exploit by the older players, a game content for a specified group is broken, so CCP will have to fix it one day, no doubt.
Angelus Ryan wrote:
Killing Sabres is easy. I'd be more annoyed at the 2xMASB Hawks if I were you. I know I am.
People pretend that they misunderstood the other's point, trying to suggest that he's a pvper rather than plex farmer.
Angelus Ryan wrote:I thought we were talking about lowsec 2/10s to start with. That's what the thread is about. Heck, I can't even get into highsec aside of passing by quick (and neither can half the people in the thread). I'm -9.8. Nearly everyone who posted has stated that he/she fully supports their removal in highsec. But leave lowsec alone. Leave our culture alone. Save the Thunderdomes!
You don't talk about the low-sec alone. Making exploration complex to be scheduled pvp club is just a misuse.
If your point stands, that "static low-sec 2/10 and 1/10 can bring more scheduled pvp, so it is good". Then we can do it on 3/10 and 4/10 etc, then saying "static low-sec 3/10 and 4/10 can bring more scheduled pvp, so it is good."
I agree that static sites in low-sec, which bring fair rewards accordingly, can be a good idea, But exploration sites are exploration sites, you should make the "static low sec pvp site" as an independent idea, which we have found it will works similar to FW sites.
Angelus Ryan wrote:I don't know how often you've been to FW systems, but calling them much better places for 1v1 PvP is pretty much false. FW is a far more gang-oriented affair
You can't blob people in a novice site,but in complex you may have to fight destroyers in a rifter, If you insist that you can blob FW people on the acceleration gate, then you can do it the same on 2/10 plex.
FW sites has actually becoming a more progress stable(No wait for re-spawn), relatively fair (according to ship type), and reward rich low-sec gameplay that will totally make the static complexes obsolete.
|